
Don't Gamble with Irving's Future.
Say NO to a
Casino.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Las Vegas Sands Corp., owned by the Adelson family, has purchased over 300 acres near the University of Dallas and the old Texas Stadium site in Irving. The Adelsons also recently bought the Dallas Mavericks. The presumed goal is to build a major casino sports complex on their new property in Irving.
​
On February 27, the City of Irving, to accommodate this development, proposed an amendment to the PUD 6 land tracts owned by Sands Corp. The amendment includes the creation of a new zoning designation “High Intensity Mixed Use” for the tracts, which includes "Casino Gaming" as a permitted use. However, casino gambling is still illegal at the Texas state level and legalization would require amending the state constitution/a statewide referendum vote. The schedule to finalize and vote on the amendment was 3 weeks from the time of the proposal.
​
For months leading up to this, city leadership engaged in behind-closed-doors discussions with Sands Corp. to craft this amendment. At the City Council work session when the amendment was first presented, most of the Council enthusiastically directed the City to proceed, with vocal opposition only from Councilman Luis Canosa. (x.com/luiscanosad4/status/1895592929105949055) When Mr. Canosa raised the fact that his constituents had not been asked, might not want a casino, and that it is fully within the power of Irving City Council to prevent this from ever happening, several council members spoke as though this issue had been thoroughly addressed and settled in public meetings. Mr. Taylor insisted that the matter had received full public treatment, referring to several previous posted meetings, which were not widely publicized. He also stated that “I haven’t had a single resident tell me this is a bad project, period.”
​
The rushed and fast-tracked 3 week timeline offered little opportunity for citizen involvement or impact studies to address the transformative implications, demonstrating a lack of regard for the community.
​
March 4th: The following week, residents came out in force to speak against the amendment at the Planning and Zoning Meeting:
x.com/yrplano/status/1897476104169914428
​
youtube.com/live/1VMUMgg0_QI?si=1XRQpankbMvwZRjF
​
​​
March 14: hundreds attended a Town Hall meeting where a Sands representative presented on how the proposed casino will only bring good to the city of Irving, receiving significant push-back from residents concerned about the negative impacts on the community: (official video coming soon, please see unofficial video, especially the Q&A:
youtu.be/2MrQ03aegyM?si=K7I4GM8hcpcz1fWb)
​
March 17: At the Planning and Zoning commission meeting on Monday evening, the committee heard 7 hours of eloquent, moving, and forceful testimony, with 100 speakers against the re-zoning of PUD 6 and only 3 speakers in favor (one of whom was a paid consultant).
Additionally, in attendance were about 15 young activists holding Sands Corporation signs who later admitted to being paid.
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-4 to recommend approval of the zoning amendment including the casino gaming use.
​
Part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=4KtQJA07iME
​
Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=Ccc_9Nb-bkU
​
​​​​
​
The City Council will vote on the amendment on March 20th. Whether you are for or against casino gambling in Irving, there has been insufficient time to undertake the proper impact studies, inform the citizens of Irving, or allow them time to provide input.
​​
​
Media Coverage
keranews.org/government/2025-03-13/irving-casino-petition-las-vegas-sands-town-hall
​
keranews.org/government/2025-03-11/irving-casino-gambling-resport
​
therealdeal.com/texas/dallas/ 2025/03/13/backlash-rises-over-sands-vision-for-irving-casino-resort/
​
dallasexpress.com/metroplex/religious-leaders-call-out-potential-irving-casinos/
​
dallasexpress.com/metroplex/changes-must-be-made-irving-city-councilman-says-of-casino-zoning-issue/
​
dallasexpress.com/metroplex/dfw-realtors-warn-of-housing-price-fallout-if-casinos-come-to-irving/
​
cbsnews.com/texas/news/residents-strongly-oppose-casino-proposal-at-irving-town-hall-meeting/
​
dallasexpress.com/metroplex/casino-clash-irving-residents-deal-a-royal-flush-to-sands-plans/
​
dmagazine.com/frontburner/2023/12/heres-where-miriam-adelson-plans-to-build-a-casino-in-dallas/
​
dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2024/05/25/whitfield-casinos-bad-for-texas/?outputType=amp
​
NEGATIVE IMPACTS
Problems Associated with Gambling
​​
Problem Gambling
Approximately 1% of the US population has a gambling addiction (a number that looks like 2.5 million US adults). Up to 8 million of the population may struggle with mild or moderate gambling problems (Yale Medicine, 2025). If Irving is going to host this population, it will need to increase its capabilities to provide support to these individuals through hotlines, counseling opportunities, and addiction recovery programs. It is unlikely that the Las Vegas Sands Corp. will foot the bill for these.
Individuals who struggle to regulate their gambling account for only 25% of all gamblers but 40-60% of slot machine revenue, and as much as 30-50% of all gambling revenue. This is the population whose economic status is most likely to be impacted by legalized and local gambling (Georgia State University, 2025; Council on Casinos, 2025).
​
Gambling and Increase in Suicide Rates
Among suicide cases in the US, 0.44 are gambling related, but that number jumps almost 9x in the state of Nevada with a rate of 4%. Oklahoma has more than double the national average number of gambling related suicides (van der Maas et al., 2024).
The overall numbers are low, but why would Irving want to bet even a single life on increasing tax revenues?
For individuals who struggle with major depressive disorder, obesity, or alcohol abuse, adding in the comorbidity of a gambling addiction increases the likelihood of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal attempts (Jolly et al., 2021).
Meta analysis reveals a positive association between problem gambling and self harm (Gray et al., 2020).
Economic Impacts of Gambling on Society
A 2020 study in Sweden identified the societal costs of problem gambling to equal the equivalent of 1.67 billion dollars (1.18 exchange rate of 2018) or 0.3% of the country’s GDP. Lost productivity due to unemployment accounted for 59% of that cost, while intangible costs such as reported reduced quality of life accounted for 28%. Overall, “the societal costs were more than twice as high as the tax revenue from gambling in 2018” (Hofmarcher, et al., 2020).
​
​
​
​
​
​
A 2023 French study on legal gambling found that draw lotteries and scratch cards had a positive social surplus, but the social surplus was negative in all scenarios for poker and sports betting (Miéra et al., 2023).
​
No individual struggles in a vacuum. Each person is part of the community and what impacts one has a widespread effect on families and neighborhoods.
​
Legalized Gambling Lowers Quality of Life
Determined by a general population panel and a group of experts who work with gamblers, a quality of life scale found that problem gamblers experience an effective enjoyment reduction of 4 years over every 10 year lifespan . This relationship held true even for low-
risk (1.4 years/ten year lifespan) and moderate-risk gamblers (2.9 years over 10 year lifespan). This puts problem gambling in the same category of quality of life reduction as a severe alcohol abuse disorder (Browne et al., 2023).
Legalized Gambling Directly Causes Property Crime and Violent Crime
Grinols and Mustard (2006) is the most rigorous study of the impact of casinos on crime. It studies a 19-year period in the US when the number of states that had casinos expanded from 1 state (Nevada) to 29 states, making it relevant to Texas's situation. They found casinos directly caused 8.6% of property crime and 12.5% of violent crime in counties with casinos, including increases in assault, rape, robbery, larceny, burglary, and auto theft. Moreover, they also find increases in crime in neighboring counties – so what happened in those casinos did not stay in those casinos.
The authors use cutting-edge statistical methods, which compare counties that got casinos to non-casino counties with similar crime trends before the casinos were built (while also controlling for a wide range of other factors that could falsely attribute the rise in crime to casinos). This approach distinguishes between correlation and causation by comparing actual outcomes against what would have happened without casinos, ruling out alternative explanations like economically struggling areas choosing to build casinos. The casinos truly did cause increases in crime.
​
It would be shocking if the Las Vegas Sands Corp. could prove that legalized gambling could in any way improve the current statistics in Irving, which are already superior to those of other US cities with legalized gambling (City Data, 2023).​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​​​​​​​​
​
Additional Impacts
While casino gambling only became legal in Pennsylvania within recent memory (2004 with the first casino opening in 2010), it has quickly led to results that Irving residents might find concerning.
-
Pennsylvania casinos now report the second highest gross gaming revenues (behind Nevada) in the US (Statista Research Department, 2024).
-
Significant increase in calls to the statewide helpline for gambling, see chart below (Hakas, 2025).
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​​​​​​
​​​​​​
​
-
This increase in problematic gambling is growing across the US. In 2021, calls to the National Problem Gambling Helpline increased by 43%, texts increased by 59.8% and chat volume increased by 84.1% (National Council on Problem Gambling, 2025).
​
"Benefits" of Employment Opportunities for Residents
Sands has touted the potential benefits of the many jobs available within such a complex, but the outlook is not necessarily rosy for Irving residents.
Divorce in These Industries
Record divorce rates among gaming managers, employees, and bartenders.
Based on data aggregated by the US Census, Yau (2017) found that the highest divorce rates occur among “gaming managers and gaming service workers - 52.9% to 50.3%.” Bartenders were second at 52.7%. Other proposed jobs within Sands' plans include spas (massage therapists came in at number 6 at 47.8%) and entertainment (professional dancers number 10 at 46.8%).
​
Substance Abuse
Among both accommodation and food service industry employees, illicit drug use and substance abuse have been recorded at rates significantly higher than other industries. Construction employees follow closely behind. See chart below (Bush & Lipari, 2015).
-
The highest rates of past month illicit drug use were found in the accommodations and food services industry (19.1 percent).
-
The workers in the accommodations and food services industry (16.9 percent) had the highest rates of past year substance use disorder.
​
​
​
​​​
​
​
Additional Resources
texastaxpayers.com/gambling-with-texas-future/
Another community that objects to Sands building near them in Long Island:
​
NY State Senators speaking during a Virtual Town Hall last year about the impact of a Casino in Manhattan




What Can I Do?
2
Spread Information and Contact Your Representatives
​Contact local businesses, churches, and schools that may be affected
​​
Talk to your neighbors
​​
Share this website:
​
Email the City Council
Irving City Leadership:
Mr. Chris Hillman, city manager
Philip Sanders, ACM in charge of casino recommendation
Elected leadership:
Rick Stopfer
District 1 John Bloch
District 2 Brad LaMorgese
District 3 Abdul Khabeer
District 4 Luis Canosa
District 5 Mark Cronenwett
District 6 Al Zapanta
District 7 Kyle Taylor
District 8 Pastor Dennis Webb
dennisWebb@cityofirving.org​​​
​
3
Attend City Planning Meetings
​​​​​City Council Meeting
on March 20
Irving City Council voted 6-3 in favor of rezoning PUD 6 for high-density mixed-use without casino gaming at this time.
​
Planning and Zoning Meeting
on March 17
After hearing approximately 7 hours of public testimony objecting to the proposal, the Commission voted 5-4 in favor of rezoning PUD 6 to include casino gaming.